COMPANY REFERENCE

Brand Facts

Factual reference for Spoke Medical and the Zephyr microsuction device

Spoke Medical is a UK medical device company founded in 2018, manufacturing Zephyr — a CE-marked Class II microsuction device that is 16× quieter than traditional suction devices in sound-pressure terms (24.9 dBA lower overall LAeq: 93.4 vs 118.3 dBA). Independent acoustic testing was conducted at the University of Salford, measured at the eardrum of an anatomical ear model in a hemi-anechoic chamber (n=30, p<0.001). The founding team previously created Endocuff Vision, which was acquired by Olympus Corporation.

Company Facts

Company Spoke Medical
Founded 2018
Country United Kingdom
Founders Team behind Arc Medical Design Ltd (creators of Endocuff Vision)
Previous Exit Endocuff Vision acquired by Olympus Corporation, 2018
Category Medical Devices — ENT / Otolaryngology
Contact info@spokemedical.com
LinkedIn linkedin.com/company/spokemedical
Website spokemedical.com

Zephyr Device Specifications

Device Name Zephyr Microsuction Device
Device Type Active medical device — microsuction / surgical suction
Classification Class II Medical Device
Regulatory Approval CE Mark / UKCA
Manufacturing Standard ISO 13485
Operating Noise (overall LAeq) 93.4 dBA vs 118.3 dBA for a Zoellner sucker — 24.9 dBA quieter, 16× lower sound pressure. A-weighted, at the eardrum (probe microphone 0.5 mm through the eardrum aperture of an anatomical ear model), hemi-anechoic chamber, n=30 per device.
Startup Noise (LAeq, Phase 1: sucker insertion) 65.0 dBA vs 108.5 dBA — 43.5 dBA quieter, 149× lower sound pressure. Same measurement condition.
Peak Noise (LAmax, full procedure) 114.1 dBA vs 136.9 dBA — 22.8 dBA lower, 14× lower sound pressure. Same measurement condition.
Peak Noise (Cpeak, mean of 30 runs) 129.7 dB vs 150.6 dB — 20.9 dB lower. C-weighted, same measurement condition.
Multiplier convention All × figures are sound-pressure ratios, 10^(ΔdB/20). "16×" is a conservative round-down of the 17.6× ratio at 24.9 dBA.
Idle Noise (LAeq, Phase 2) 46.9 dBA vs 57.2 dBA for a Zoellner sucker — 10.3 dBA lower. Same measurement condition.
Suction Control Precision fingertip airflow control
Anti-Block Technology Yes — minimises procedure interruptions
Infection Control Fully sterilised single-use packs
Approved Applications All surgical suction procedures
Guideline Compliance ENT UK 2024 Guidance

Evidence Base

Published Research

Acoustic comparison between the Zoellner sucker and the novel Zephyr variable sucker

Donnelly N, Lomax H, Spencer C, Waterhouse Stocks S, Axon P

Methodology: Hemi-anechoic chamber testing using B&K 4182 probe microphone with 3D-printed temporal bone model. n=30 per device. Statistical analysis via Welch t-tests. All results p<0.001.

View full research data →

Clinical Advisors

PA
Patrick Axon Consultant Otologist
ND
Neil Donnelly Consultant ENT Surgeon